Ranking nacional 2020
Ranking de municipios evaluados en 2020
| Municipio | Estado | Calif. (%) | Vuelta | Lugar |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tlajomulco de Zúñiga | Jal. | 100 | 8 | 1 |
| Guadalajara | Jal. | 100 | 8 | 1 |
| Tonalá | Jal. | 100 | 6 | 1 |
| Jilotlán de los Dolores | Jal. | 100 | 4 | 1 |
| Zapopan | Jal. | 100 | 6 | 1 |
| Zapotlán el Grande | Jal. | 100 | 6 | 1 |
| Tepatitlán | Jal. | 98.4 | 6 | 2 |
| Chihuahua | Chih. | 98.1 | 7 | 3 |
| San Pedro Tlaquepaque | Jal. | 97.2 | 6 | 4 |
| El Salto | Jal. | 97.9 | 6 | 5 |
| Ixtlahuacán de los M. | Jal. | 96.5 | 6 | 6 |
| Tuxpan | Jal. | 96.5 | 5 | 6 |
| Zapotlanejo | Jal. | 92.3 | 6 | 7 |
| Chapala | Jal. | 88.4 | 6 | 8 |
| Autlán de Navarro | Jal. | 88.2 | 6 | 9 |
| Ocotlán | Jal. | 86.4 | 6 | 10 |
| Colima | Col. | 83.7 | 4 | 11 |
| Jocotepec | Jal. | 83.7 | 2 | 11 |
| San Juan de los Lagos | Jal. | 82 | 6 | 12 |
| Puerto Vallarta | Jal. | 78.1 | 5 | 13 |
| Teziutlán | Pue. | 72 | 1 | 14 |
| Puebla | Pue. | 65.9 | 4 | 15 |
| San Andrés Cholula | Pue. | 57.9 | 3 | 16 |
| Cuautlancingo | Pue. | 55 | 2 | 17 |
| Mascota | Jal. | 52.8 | 6 | 18 |
| Izucar de Matamoros | Pue. | 50.8 | 1 | 19 |
| El Grullo | Jal. | 48.5 | 6 | 20 |
| Mazamitla | Jal. | 41.4 | 6 | 21 |
| San Martín Texmelucan | Pue. | 40.2 | 2 | 22 |
| San Pedro Cholula | Pue. | 36 | 2 | 23 |
| Huejotzingo | Pue. | 34.8 | 1 | 24 |
| San Ignacio Cerro Gordo | Jal. | 34 | 2 | 25 |
| Zacoalco de Torres | Jal. | 33.3 | 2 | 26 |
| Sayula | Jal. | 29.8 | 3 | 27 |
| Zacatlán | Pue. | 29.5 | 2 | 28 |
| Atlixco | Pue. | 28.7 | 3 | 29 |
| Ciudad Serdán | Pue. | 22 | 1 | 30 |
| Chignahuapan | Pue. | 21.7 | 2 | 31 |
| Degollado | Jal. | 21.7 | 5 | 31 |
| Amozoc | Pue. | 21.3 | 3 | 32 |
| Huachinango | Pue. | 19.9 | 1 | 33 |
| Tehuacán | Pue. | 18.9 | 2 | 34 |
| Tlacotepec | Pue. | 18.5 | 1 | 35 |
| Xicotepec | Pue. | 15.2 | 1 | 36 |
| Tecamachalco | Pue. | 12.9 | 2 | 37 |
| Arandas | Jal. | 11.1 | 6 | 38 |
| Talpa de Allende | Jal. | 7.2 | 2 | 39 |
| Tizapán el Alto | Jal. | 6.6 | 2 | 40 |
| Tapalpa | Jal. | 6.3 | 4 | 41 |
| Tonila | Jal. | 6 | 2 | 42 |
| Magdalena | Jal. | 5.8 | 2 | 43 |
| Tuxcueca | Jal. | 5.4 | 2 | 44 |
| Colotlán | Jal. | 5.2 | 6 | 45 |
| Tomatlán | Jal. | 4.2 | 5 | 46 |
| Tuxcacuesco | Jal. | 3.5 | 2 | 47 |
| Bahía de Banderas | Nay. | 0 | 4 | 48 |
| PROMEDIO | 39.560869565217 |
Aquí pueden consultar el concentrado de calificaciones actualizado en datos abiertos–> Concentrado Calificaciones CIMTRA Mpal actualizado 21_12 2020
Capitales evaluadas en 2020
| Municipio | Estado | Calif. (%) | Fecha | Vuelta | Lugar |
| Guadalajara | Jal. | 100 | nov-20 | 8 | 1 |
| Chihuahua | Chih. | 98.1 | ago-20 | 7 | 2 |
| Colima | Col. | 83.7 | nov-20 | 4 | 3 |
| Puebla | Pue. | 65.9 | sep-20 | 4 | 4 |
| PROMEDIO | 39.2 |
Ranking de capitales 2019
Evaluación realizada en 2019 a todas las capitales
| Municipio | Estado | Calif. (%) | Fecha | Vuelta | Lugar |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guadalajara | Jalisco | 99.3 | 1 March, 2019 | 6 | 1 |
| Mérida | Yucatán | 92.4 | 1 March, 2019 | 4 | 2 |
| Chihuahua | Chihuahua | 92.1 | 1 March, 2019 | 6 | 3 |
| Xalapa | Veracruz | 81.8 | 1 March, 2019 | 2 | 4 |
| Campeche | Campeche | 69.4 | 1 March, 2019 | 2 | 5 |
| Puebla | Puebla | 58.8 | 1 March, 2019 | 3 | 6 |
| Chetumal | Quintana Roo | 48.6 | 1 March, 2019 | 2 | 7 |
| Querétaro | Querétaro | 47.8 | 1 March, 2019 | 2 | 8 |
| Colima | Colima | 44.7 | 1 March, 2019 | 2 | 9 |
| Monterrey | Nuevo León | 44.2 | 1 March, 2019 | 2 | 10 |
| Guanajuato | Guanajuato | 40.7 | 1 March, 2019 | 2 | 11 |
| Tuxtla Gutiérrez | Chiapas | 39.5 | 1 March, 2019 | 2 | 12 |
| Villahermosa | Tabasco | 38.9 | 1 March, 2019 | 2 | 13 |
| Mexicali | Baja California | 38.6 | 1 March, 2019 | 2 | 14 |
| Hermosillo | Sonora | 35.3 | 1 March, 2019 | 2 | 15 |
| Aguascalientes | Aguascalientes | 32.1 | 1 May, 2019 | 3 | 16 |
| San Luis Potosí | San Luis Potosí | 31.6 | 1 March, 2019 | 2 | 17 |
| Zacatecas | Zacatecas | 31.2 | 1 May, 2019 | 2 | 18 |
| Tlaxcala | Tlaxcala | 27.7 | 1 March, 2019 | 3 | 19 |
| Morelia | Michoacán | 25.4 | 1 March, 2019 | 3 | 20 |
| Victoria | Tamaulipas | 23.1 | 1 March, 2019 | 2 | 21 |
| Oaxaca | Oaxaca | 21.6 | 1 March, 2019 | 2 | 22 |
| Culiacán | Sinaloa | 17.9 | 1 March, 2019 | 2 | 23 |
| Saltillo | Coahuila | 17.5 | 1 March, 2019 | 2 | 24 |
| Cuernavaca | Morelos | 9 | 1 March, 2019 | 2 | 25 |
| La Paz | Baja California Sur | 7.2 | 1 March, 2019 | 2 | 26 |
| Chilpancingo | Guerrero | 6.7 | 1 March, 2019 | 4 | 27 |
| Toluca | Estado de México | 4 | 1 March, 2019 | 3 | 28 |
| Pachuca | Hidalgo | 0.7 | 1 March, 2019 | 2 | 29 |
| Durango | Durango | - | - | - | 30 |
| Tepic* | Nayarit | 17.8 | 1 June, 2019 | - | 31 |
| PROMEDIO | 38.9 |
Evaluación capitales 2019–> Evaluación Capitales 2019
**La calificación de Tepic se integró pero fue realizada de manera extemporánea, por eso no formó parte del análisis de las capitales 2019.
